example-twenty-five

Once again, it is glaringly, blindingly obvious that these angles are NOT randomly distributed, as they absolutely SHOULD be if Newtonian Physics alone governed the movements of celestial bodies. (The gravitational field of Earth is insufficiently strong to alter or affect the revolution periods of distant satellites.) Once again, these angles all (mysteriously) “hug” the octants. “Something else” (other than Newtonian Physics) is influencing and dictating the movements of these satellites.

The statistical odds against these angles “hugging” the octants so closely are in excess of 1 chance in 260. These odds are calculated in the following manner:- Focussing only on items A and B, the largest deviation from an octant is 0.45 degrees (Charon).

Number of trials = n = 5 and number of successful trials = r = 2 and the probability that any single specific trial will be successful = p = (0.45 x 2 x 8) ÷ 360 = 0.02 and the probability that any single specific trial will be unsuccessful = 1 minus p = 0.98

p(r ≥ 2) = ⁵C₂ x 0.98³ x 0.02² = 0.003765

+ ⁵C₃ x 0.98² x 0.02³ = 0.0000768

SUM = 0.003842 or 1 chance in 260.

However, it could be argued that these satellites (which are relatively close to one another) can easily influence the movements of one another by gravitational attraction and “tidal friction”, and that being the case, their movements could be synchronized with the movements of Earth purely by chance. This argument is undermined by the fact that ALL the satellites of (just about) EVERY planet have their movements synchronized with the movements of Earth.

To verify the numerical data in this example, go to Appendix 2, Section 4 for Pluto satellites. (Note:- Numerical data verification is only available in the book.)